Volume 75 August 2022 Essay Rethinking Strategy After Dobbs David S. Cohen, Greer Donley & Rachel Rebouché * ...

Abstract. This Essay scrutinizes the feuding between the Trump White House and various federal law enforcement agencies, concurrent with criminal lawbreaking in the Trump Administration, in an effort ...

Stanford Law Review Volume 7 Front Row (l to r): Virginia Birch, Marvin D. Morgenstein, Stephen H. Suffin, Mrs. Vivian N. Hannawalt, Reed Watkins, C. Hugh Friedman ...

In her powerful dissent, Justice Ginsburg proclaimed an “overriding interest” in “keeping the courts ‘out of the business of evaluating’ . . . the sincerity with which an asserted religious belief is ...

Immigration detention in the U.S. is civil confinement for which the officially stated purpose is to facilitate the removal of individuals who do not have permission to remain in the country. With ...

This Essay argues that legal challenges to Trump’s restrictive immigration policies should call out white nationalism as the underlying harm, both through raising equal protection claims and in ...

This revolution has its dissidents. Critics worry the world’s increasing “datafication” ignores or even smothers the unquantifiable, immeasurable, ineffable parts of human experience. [3] They warn of ...

A striking feature of proceedings at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) is that the executive always wins. Between 1979 and 2012—the ...

Introduction Amalia D. Kessler’s Inventing American Exceptionalism is a tour de force of historical imagination, analysis, and synthesis. 1 Amalia D. Kessler, Inventing American Exceptionalism: The ...

In this Response, Kim Forde-Mazrui discusses Sonja Starr’s recent Stanford Law Review Article The Magnet School Wars and the Future of Colorblindness. Starr’s Article can be found here. I. Alternative ...

Aditya Bamzai and Peter Shane trace the enduring debate of the President’s removal power. Together they provide a comprehensive yet succinct history ...

The landscape of American history is littered with facially racist, misogynistic, homophobic, xenophobic, and other demeaning, marginalizing, and subordinating laws. Many more facially neutral laws ...