In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court held that age verification for explicit sites is constitutional. In a dissent, Justice ...

Constitutional rights have to be enforceable. They can’t rely on the goodwill of the government. This utter lack of ...

The decision reinforces efforts by nearly half of all U.S. states that have passed similar age-verification laws.

The Supreme Court has ... adult material from minors, but digital rights groups have raised questions about such laws' effects on free speech and whether verifying ages by accessing sensitive data ...

Analysts suggest that a Supreme Court hearing—and eventual decision—could set a transformative legal precedent regarding digital privacy.

As Third Circuit Judge Paul Matey bluntly put, Big Tech "smuggles constitutional conceptions of a 'free trade in ideas' into a digital 'cauldron of illicit ... Unfortunately for TikTok, the Supreme ...

Without age verification, there’s no actual knowledge and thus no privacy protections. The Supreme Court’s reasoning ... verification before kids can spend money on digital gambling mechanics follows ...

Conclusion The Harper case presents a critical opportunity for the Supreme Court to address the evolving landscape of financial privacy in the digital age.

Major Supreme Court cases that remain include a challenge to President Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship. About two weeks remain in the term.

The Supreme Court appeared sympathetic to state laws requiring online age verification for websites hosting explicit adult content.

Coinbase joins Elon Musk’s X and states in urging the Supreme Court to revisit digital privacy rules, challenging IRS access to crypto user data under the decades-old third-party doctrine.

The Supreme Court will decide whether laws requiring adult entertainment websites to conduct electronic age verification violate the First Amendment.